1. Gujjar KR, van Wijk A, Kumar R, de Jongh A. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of dental phobia in adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord 2019 Mar;62:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.12.001
2. BHATNAGAR A, BHATNAGAR E. VIRTUAL REALITY AND DENTISTRY. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2023 May 15;6–8. doi: 10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i3.3005
3. van der Kruk SR, Zielinski R, MacDougall H, Hughes-Barton D, Gunn KM. Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2022 Jul;105(7):1928–1942. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.02.005
4. Zhao N, Fan L, Zeng J, Ran L, Zhang C, Wang J, Yu C. Virtual reality in managing dental pain and anxiety: a comprehensive review. Front Med 2023 Dec 5;10. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1285142
5. Moussa R, Alghazaly A, Althagafi N, Eshky R, Borzangy S. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Interactive Simulators on Dental Education Outcomes: Systematic Review. Eur J Dent 2022 Feb 24;16(01):14–31. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731837
6. Cunningham A, McPolin O, Fallis R, Coyle C, Best P, McKenna G. A systematic review of the use of virtual reality or dental smartphone applications as interventions for management of paediatric dental anxiety. BMC Oral Health 2021 Dec 7;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01602-3
7. Towers A, Field J, Stokes C, Maddock S, Martin N. A scoping review of the use and application of virtual reality in pre-clinical dental education. Br Dent J 2019 Mar 8;226(5):358–366. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0041-0
8. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015 Dec 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
9. Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J 2020 Jun;37(6):387–387. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209567
10. Motahari-Nezhad H. An artificial neural network (ANN) model for publication bias: a machine learning-based study on PubMed meta-analyses. Aslib J Inf Manag 2023 Jan 24; doi: 10.1108/AJIM-08-2022-0364
11. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019 Aug 28;l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
12. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis. Biometrics 2000 Jun 24;56(2):455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
13. Song F, Hooper, Loke Y. Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? Open Access J Clin Trials 2013 Jul;71. doi: 10.2147/OAJCT.S34419
14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008 May 3;336(7651):995–998. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE
15. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. Introduction to GRADE Handbook Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. 2013. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.9rdbelsnu4iy [accessed Jan 15, 2021]
16. Motahari-Nezhad H, Péntek M, Gulácsi L, Zrubka Z. Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. JMIR Res Protoc 2021 Nov 24;10(11):e28204. doi: 10.2196/28204