1. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp, 11ed (2016) chapter 6 cleaning and shaping the root canal system.
2. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18(2):269-296.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00677-2]
3. Saber SEDM, El Sadat SMA. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of wave one nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(5):685-688.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.007]
4. Weine FS, Kelly RF. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975;1(8):255-262.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9]
5. Marzouk AM, Ghoneim AG. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod. 2013;39(7):906-909.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.023]
6. Hülsmann M, Peters O a., Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques, and means. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):30-76.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x]
7. Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless-steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91(6):715-718.
[https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114159]
8. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014; 40(6): 852-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010] [PMID: 24862716]
9. Ceyhanli KT, Erdilek N, Tatar I, Çetintav B. Comparative micro-computed tomography evaluation of apical root canal transportation with the use of ProTaper, RaCe and Safe sider systems in human teeth. Aust Endod J 2014;
40(1): 12-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aej.12014] [PMID: 24697959]
10. Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and HyFlex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015; 48(2): 131-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12291] [PMID: 24697590]
11. Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Development and sequelae of canal transportation. Endod Topics. 2009;15:75–90.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00236.x]
12. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369-375.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4]
13. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014;40(6):852-856.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010]
14. Karkehabadi H, Siahvashi Z, Shokri A, Haji Hasani N. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro
study. BMC Oral Health (2021) 21:277
[https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01617-w]
15. Eliasz W, Kubiak K, Poncyljusz W, Surdacka A. Root Canal Transportation after Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold, and Twisted Files. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3661
[https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113661]
16. Hassan R, Roshdy N, Issa N. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Xp Shaper, WaveOne and OneShape: A cone beam computed tomography study of curved root canals. ISSN 1852-4834
[https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.78443]
17. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32:271275
[https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1]
18. da Frota MF, Filho IB, Berbert FL, Sponchiado EC Jr, Marques AA, Garcia Lda F.Cleaning capacity promoted by motor-driven or manual instrumentation using ProTaper Universal system: histological analysis. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16:79-82
[doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105305] [PMID: 23349583]
19. Faul, Franz, et al. "G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences." Behavior research methods 39.2 (2007): 175-191