Cell-attached capacitance measurements at release sites of a central nerve terminal

doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.363

Method Article

Cell-attached capacitance measurements at release sites of a central nerve terminal

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.363

This protocol has been posted on Protocol Exchange, an open repository of community-contributed protocols sponsored by Nature Portfolio. These protocols are posted directly on the Protocol Exchange by authors and are made freely available to the scientific community for use and comment.

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest protocol version

Neuroscience

Cell biology

Developmental biology

Biological techniques

calyx of held

cell-attached capacitance measurement

single vesicle fusion

fusion pore conductance

The cell-attached capacitance recording technique is a powerful technique that has been successfully used to resolve single vesicle fusion and fusion pore conductance¹. This technique, however, has not been applied to synapses because of the difficulty in accessing release sites. Here, we developed a technique to expose release sites in a large nerve terminal, the calyx of Held, which contains clear-core glutamatergic vesicles. At the exposed presynaptic release sites, we performed low noise cell-attached capacitance recordings, which allowed us to resolve single vesicle fusion and fusion pore conductance.

The bath solution for the dissection and storage of slices contained (in mM): 95 NaCl, 25 NaHCO₃, 25 glucose, 50 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH₂PO₄, 0.1 CaCl₂, and 3 MgCl₂, 0.4 ascorbic acid, 3 myo-inositol, 2 sodium pyruvate (95% O₂/5% CO₂).

The bath solution for recordings contained (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl₂, 2 CaCl₂, 25 dextrose, 1.25 NaH₂PO₄, 0.4 ascorbic acid, 3 myo-inositol, 2 sodium pyruvate, 25 NaHCO₃, pH 7.4 when bubbled with 95% O₂, 5% CO₂.

The pipette solution contained (in mM): NaCl 130, KCl 2.5, CaCl₂ 2, MgCl₂ 1, HEPES 10, TEA 20, pH 7.2, adjusted with NaOH (osmolarity was 310-320 Osm).

Sylgard (Dow Corning Corporation, U.S.A.)

Vibratome (Integraslice 7550 PSDS, Campden Instruments )

SR830 2-phase lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research Systems, Stanford, CA)

EPC-8 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA electronics, Lambrecht, Germany)

Macintosh computer

CPM-2 Coating and polishing microforge (ALA Scientific Instruments)

Glass pipettes (Borosilicate- STD. wall with flame polished ends, OD 2.0 mm, ID 1.16 mm, Warner Instruments Inc.)

Prepare parasigittal brainstem slices (200 μm thick) containing the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body from 6-8 days old Wistar rats using a vibratome².
Position brain slices in the recording chamber. Select a large calyx (aboout 1-2μm in thickness) on the surface of the slice (Fig. 1, left). Use a large pipette (1-2MΩ) to form a loose patch on the postsynapse membrane (Fig. 1, middle left). Suck the postsynaptic neuronal cell body into the pipette by applying a strong suction to the pipette, and pull away the pipette. As a result, the cell body of the postsynaptic neuron should be pulled out (Fig. 1, middle right). This should expose the calyx membrane that was originally opposing the postsynaptic neuron.
Using a polished pipette (4-6 MΩ) heavily coated with sylgard near the tip, form a cell-attached patch at the exposed presynaptic membrane, which presumably contains release sites.
After forming a high resistance (> 10 GΩ) seal, stop the perfusion system, and lower the bath solution level to just above the slice, which helps to reduce noise.
Make cell-attached capacitance measurements with an SR830 2-phase lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research Systems, Stanford, CA) coupled to an EPC-8 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA electronics, Lambrecht, Germany)^1,3,4. A 20 KHz sine wave (rms: 200 mV) should be superimposed on a command potential of 0 mV. The in-phase (real or Re, corresponding to conductance) and the 90^o out-of-phase (imaginary, Im, corresponding to capacitance) current outputs of the lock-in amplifier should be low-pass filtered at 0.1-1 ms (24 dB), digitized at 16 bits, and read into a Macintosh computer.
For an EPC-8 amplifier, set the gain at 50 mV/pA, C_slow and G_slow should be 0.2 pF and 0.2 μS, respectively, and C_fast and ?_fast pF should be adjusted to minimize the sinusoidal current. The current output of the EPC-8 amplifier should be connected to the lock-in amplifier input through a 10:1 voltage divider.
During cell-attached capacitance measurements, the initial phase setting of the lock-in amplifier should be approximately adjusted to null the changes in Re trace induced by dithering a 100-fF calibration installed in the capacitance compensation circuit of EPC-8. Apply a gentle suction of the membrane via the pipette every 100-200 s during each patch of cell-attached recordings. Use the transient capacitance increase caused by the gentle suction to correct phase errors offline (Fig. 2a). After the experiment, correct phase errors by re-computing Re and Im traces with the phase shift varied in 2° increments until the projection in the Re trace during a gentle suction (Fig. 2a, left) is eliminated (Fig. 2b, left). This phase adjustment should also eliminate the visible, persistent change in Re trace associated with the non-flicker up-steps in the Im trace of the same patch (Fig. 2a-b, right). With the phase adjustment described above, we occasionally observed flickers in Re trace without accompanying a change in Im trace (Fig. 2c), which might reflect openings and closings of a single ion channel.

Removing the postsynaptic neuron was the first critical step. The suck-and-pull protocol could not remove the postsynapic neuron every time. Only when the cell body of the postsynatpic neruon was not visible under the microscope, we perfomed cell-attached recordings at the exposed presynaptic membrane.
To obtain low noise recording, the pipette was heavily coated with sylgard to near the tip, the surface level of bath solution was lowered to just above the slice, and the seal resistance was kept at more than 10 GΩ.
Off-line phase adjustment was critical for measurements of capacitance steps and fusion pore conductances. The gentle suction repeated every 100-200 seconds during recordings was instrumental for off-line phase adjustment.

1.Lindau,M. & Alvarez de Toledo G. The fusion pore. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 164, 167-173 (2003).

2.Sun,J.Y., Wu,X.S. & Wu,L.G. Single and multiple vesicle fusion induce different rates of endocytosis at a central synapse. Nature 417, 555-559 (2002).

3.Klyachko,V.A. & Jackson,M.B. Capacitance steps and fusion pores of small and large-dense-core vesicles in nerve terminals. Nature 418, 89-92 (2002).

4.Debus,K. & Lindau,M. Resolution of patch capacitance recordings and of fusion pore conductances in small vesicles. Biophysical Journal 78, 2983-2997 (2000).

We greatly thank Drs. Vitaly Klyachko and Manfred Lindau for providing critical technical guidance on cell-attached recordings.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest protocol version

Cell-attached capacitance measurements at release sites of a central nerve terminal

Status:

Version 1

Figures

Introduction

Reagents

Equipment

Procedure

Critical Steps

References

Acknowledgements

Associated Publications

Status:

Version 1

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cell-attached capacitance measurements at release sites of a central nerve terminal

Status:

Version 1

Figures

Introduction

Reagents

Equipment

Procedure

Critical Steps

References

Acknowledgements

Associated Publications

Status:

Version 1

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Manage Cookie Preferences