Haplotype-Fusion PCR

doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.158

Method Article

Haplotype-Fusion PCR

https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.158

This protocol has been posted on Protocol Exchange, an open repository of community-contributed protocols sponsored by Nature Portfolio. These protocols are posted directly on the Protocol Exchange by authors and are made freely available to the scientific community for use and comment.

Version 1

posted 10 Jul, 2006

You are reading this latest protocol version

Genetics

haplotyping

haplotype

genotyping

genotype

single molecule

emulsion

fusion PCR

inversion

bead

polony

Inversions frequently result from non allelic homologous recombination between long (>10kb) inverted repeats, making them difficult to detect with long PCR or RFLP analysis. We have developed PCR-based single molecule haplotyping methods that enable both surveys for novel inversion variants, and population-scale genotyping of known inversions (Turner et al 2006).

The inversion genotype of an individual can be deduced from their genomic DNA if single molecule haplotyping is performed on the DNA fragments that span the inversion breakpoints. Fusion PCR (Yon and Fried 1989) allows sequences at either side of an inversion breakpoint to be joined together, and performing the reaction in an oil : water emulsion (Ghadessy et al 2001) ensures that the DNA templates are single molecules in the overwhelming majority of cases.

In practice, the haplotyping method used depends on the length of the inverted repeat relative to the size of DNA fragments in the genomic DNA preparation. If the repeat is shorter than the template fragment lengths (around 100kb), single copy sequences on either side of an inverted repeat can be joined and the inversion genotyped by generating fused products of different sizes for the two orientations.

For longer repeats, paralog-specific nucleotides are analysed in a magnetic bead-based version of the assay.

Reagents:

Genomic DNA samples

10X Phusion HF buffer (Finnzymes)

25mM MgCl₂

2.5mM dNTPs

10µM primers (outer forward and reverse)

1µM fusion primer

Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzymes)

Span 80 (Sigma)

Tween 80 (Sigma)

Triton X-100 (Sigma)

Light mineral oil (Sigma)

Hexane (Aldrich)

agarose

2ml Cryo-Vial (Corning)

Magnetic stirring bar (8 x 3mm with a pivot ring; VWR International)

Magnetic stirrer

MJ Research thermocycler

Agarose gel electrophoresis and gel visualisation equipment

Prepare PCR reactions ("aqueous phase") on ice in a total volume of 100µl using 1X Phusion HF buffer, an additional 1mM MgCl₂ , 250 µM dNTPs, 1µM outside primers and 10nM fusion PCR primer, 200 ng genomic DNA and 16 units Phusion polymerase.
Put 200 µl oil phase (4.5% v/v Span 80, 0.4% v/v Tween 80 and 0.05% Triton X-100 dissolved in light mineral oil) in a 2 ml Cryo-Vial and stirring at 1000 rpm with a magnetic bar (8 x 3mm with a pivot ring).
Add 1 drop of aqueous phase to oil phase every 5 seconds and continue stirring for 5 minutes after addition of the first drop.
Transfer 125 µl of emulsion to a clean 200 µl, thin wall PCR tube and overlay with 1 drop of mineral oil. Run standard Phusion polymerase PCR cycle.
Transfer completed PCR reactions to a 1.5 ml tube and add 400 µl hexane. Vortex thoroughly and centrifuge at full speed for 3 minutes. Remove and discard hexane layer (upper layer). Repeat with 400 µl fresh hexane.

PAUSE POINT: reactions can be stored at -20 ^oC for several days.

Dilute PCR products 100x with water and reamplify in solution omitting the fusion primer.
Separate PCR products using gel electrophoresis.

6-7 hours (including reamplification and gel)

All steps are critical to success of the procedure unless otherwise stated in the 'Troubleshooting' section.

The efficiency of the reaction is maximised by fusing short amplicons (<= 150 bp each).

The given protocol is used when the inverted repeats that give rise to the inversion are short (<100 kb). For longer repeats it is necessary to quantify the fusion PCR products and to use bead-based PCR in emulsion followed by single base extension and microscopy. This increases the length of time for the procedure considerably.

The use of a polymerase that does not leave an A-tail is unnecessary for the technique to work but not doing so can affect subsequent steps. 2i. Preparing larger volumes of oil phase (e.g. 20 ml) can help to avoid pipetting inconsistencies caused by the high viscosity of the components.

2ii. Stirring speed is just estimated from looking at the dial.

Addition of occasional drops sooner or later than after 5 seconds does not seem to affect the stability of the emulsion significantly.
It is probably not necessary to overlay reactions with mineral oil. No special cycling conditions are required.
Following cycling some separation of the emulsion usually occurs. The degree of separation is affected by precise stirring speed and the rate of aqueous phase addition. It is important to perform the hexane cleanup on the thick, opaque emulsion and to leave any clear liquid at the bottom of the tube untouched. The mineral oil on top of the emulsion can be included in the cleanup. It is probably fine to perform a single hexane step. Ethoxy ethane can be used instead of hexane, and is more efficient at disrupting emulsions but presents more of a potential hazard.
Because the efficiency of performing a single step fusion PCR in an emulsion is low, PCR products will probably not be visible in a gel even after ethanol precipitation and running of the entire reaction, so reamplification with just the outer primers is necessary to increase the quantity of fused product. Dilution of fused PCR products gives cleaner products after reamplification. Reamplification can be performed using a standard polymerase.

An assay designed to distinguish between wild-type and pathogenic orientations of the haemophilia-causing X-chromosome Factor VIII gene inversion can produce two differently sized fusion products, indicating the different orientations. In female carriers of the inversion both products are obtained whereas a single product is obtained from female wild-type and male individuals.

When the PCR is performed in solution rather than emulsion, both fusion products are obtained from all individuals.

Using this assay we genotyped blind a mixed population of ten males with and without the int22h inversion with 100% concordance with the known inversion genotypes.

Ghadessy, F. J., Ong, J. L. & Holliger, P. Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 4552-7 (2001).

Turner, D. J., Shendure, J., Porreca, G., Church, G., Green, P., Tyler-Smith, C. & Hurles, M. E. Assaying chrommosomal inversions by single molecule haplotyping. Nat. Methods 3, 439-445 (2006).

Wetmur, J. G. et al. Molecular haplotyping by linking emulsion PCR: analysis of paraoxonase 1 haplotypes and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 2615-9 (2005).

Yon, J. & Fried, M. Precise gene fusion by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 4895 (1989).

The authors would like to thank Philipp Holliger and Zoryana Oliynyk for advice on emulsion preparation and Mark Ross for insights into Xq28.

PDF

Version 1

posted 10 Jul, 2006

You are reading this latest protocol version

Haplotype-Fusion PCR

Status:

Version 1

Figures

Introduction

Reagents

Equipment

Procedure

Timing

Critical Steps

Troubleshooting

Anticipated Results

References

Acknowledgements

Associated Publications

Status:

Version 1

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookie Settings